**this site is under construction forever**

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Even High Achievers Are Affected by the Classroom Structure

Reference: Ames, C. & Archer, J. (1988) Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.


What is the article about? The article studied how student's learning strategies and motivational processes are affected by how they perceive the goal structure of the classroom is.

All students in the study were high achievers and the following information was gathered:

*students identified goal orientation of a classroom on a specific subject matter whether Mastery or Performance goal is salient.

The following summary of Master vs Performance taken from Table 1 of the said article (page 261)

MASTERY GOALPERFORMANCE GOAL
Success defined as...Improvement, progressHigh grades, high normative performance
Value placed on...Effort/learningNormatively high ability
Reasons for satisfaction.. .Working hard, challengeDoing better than others
Teacher oriented toward...How students are learningHow students are performing
View of errors/mistakes...Part of learningAnxiety eliciting
Focus of attention...Process of learningOwn performance relative to others'
Reasons for effort...Learning something newHigh grades, performing better than others
Evaluation criteria...Absolute, progressNormative


*students reported on their use of learning strategies in the subject for:

  1. info processing
  2. self planning
  3. self monitoring

*students chose on task preference whether a) learning more and being challenged or b) giving little effort and sure to do well

*student's attitude was done by asking the student about their likeness for the class

*students were assessed where they attributed success and failure

*students identified their perceived ability for the subject

Results: Students varied on their reports for goal orientation classroom structure, learning strategies, attitude, task preference and perceived ability, showing that high achievers vary in their causes of their achievement and even high achievers, have wide range of learning strategies used.

GOAL ORIENTATION versus LEARNING STRATEGIES. - in classrooms perceived to be mastery goal oriented, students were more likely to use effective learning strategies

GOAL ORIENTATION versus ATTITUDE - in classrooms perceived to be mastery goal oriented, students liked the class more

GOAL ORIENTATION versus TASK CHOICES - in classrooms perceived to be mastery goal oriented, students were more likely to prefer challenging tasks

GOAL ORIENTATION versus CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS. - in classrooms perceived to be mastery goal oriented, students believe that success and effort are connected

Further analysis of the factors by dividing the goal orientation to 4 groups.

High Mastery - High Performance
High Mastery - Low Performance
Low Mastery - High Performance
Low Mastery - Low Performance

A pattern revealed that there was a significant difference between the high and low mastery goal orientation regardless of the level for perfomance goal. In other words, there were no difference within high mastery or within low mastery groups.


What are the implications for practice? The study shows that although high achievers are already expected to practice effective learning strategies and motivational practices which are assumed to influence their achievement, these factors are still dependent on how the students percieve the goal structure of the classroom may be.

More specifically, these learning strategies and motivational processes are dependent on the degree of the saliency of mastery goal orientation regardless of the presence of performance goals. It means that decreasing the presence of performance goals in our classrooms is not the solution for better classroom learning but rather we should emphasize more on making our classrooms percieved by students to be Mastery Goal Oriented.


*A reminder for students who come across my post, I am flattered for whatever purpose my reviews might help you in your research or studies, but please always keep in mind to observe Anti-Plagiarism.
*This review was intended for my personal benefit to keep track of the new information I gather from an article I have read. As I am open to some queries about the research (as much as my capacity can offer), reading the original article is highly recommended. Open discussions about the topic is also encouraged from others who can contribute to the ideas.



Question of the day: What Goal Orientation Do You Possess?

Lesson of the day: Make your learning environment, away from distractions. i.e. "DELETE ZE FACEBOOK ACCOUNT!" haha

5 comments:

AbBy said...

Hmm. u've got an interesting point toni...i would prefer performance goal since i would like to think that high performance means mastery and sufficient know-how on a particular field.

that reminds me, how are you going to assess a classroom with students ranging from both extremes (high and low)?

I had a hard time balancing both when I was teaching since it's hard to move forward to advance topics - i felt like a pendulum for a while. maybe u can help me in that area, I only know much about financial management. I've yet to venture the learning and teaching techniques since I'm still new in teaching (I'm not teaching now btw, but I would love to when I have the time - in the near future).

Toni Rose said...

lol hi abby, actually that’s why education field is stressing on emphasizing mastery goal in classrooms because performance goals (see the table) focuses primarily on results or outcomes...(i.e. the end justify the means) like getting the high grades or performing better than others. Students with performance goals would then prefer tasks that assure them of high grades and would blame their ability if they fail on the task.
Mastery goal oriented students however, would focus on increasing competency and view failure, as in a way, learning from their mistakes. Mastery goal oriented students would prefer tasks that challenge them because it tests their competency.

Mastery Goal is more long term because your interest in learning more about a specific topic is promoted rather than just focusing on getting good grades wherein learning is very superficial.
My prof said that the two achievement goals however are not to be viewed as dichotomous but rather it is to be viewed as a continuum (meaning instead of viewing it either BLACK or WHITE.. there are gray areas)
You may be in the middle. Or more on performance, or more on mastery...

LOL can’t believe i can actually explain this to a non-educ person, if you understood my explaination that is.... anyway. In my thesis, there are actually 4 types of achievement goals. (or also known as achievement motivation) .. The first two are the Mastery Oriented and Performance oriented. And the other two is the 3) Work-Avoidant and 4) Social something i forgot hahahaha
Work avoidant, well students prefer to avoid the tasks and do everything to delay or get away from it. Lol that’s their motivation. To avoid doing it.

And the social thing.. something about ... doing things the way their peers are doing it to be socially accepted. Makes sense? Haha .. need to read again about my thesis.

Anyway ... did u see my lesson of the day. Hahahaha... seems very effective to me right now.

Toni Rose said...

by the way. in answering your concern... about the high and low students...

i think that's why promoting a classroom that is mastery oriented is important. because the behind students will gain more interest in learning and gaining their competency wherein learning strategies will follow.

they might like, research on their own since the interest for learning is already there (cause by the mastery goal structure of the classroom)


BY THE WAY I DIDNT KNOW U WERE TEACHING! hehehe


can i pass to be a consultant already? lol hahahahaha

Toni Rose said...

another add... the reason why the article chose high achievers for the study is that to prove ... that getting high grades... does not necessarily conclude they have mastered the subject... maybe they are just "good" in taking exams.

but if the student is mastery goal oriented, then... you know that the reasons behind those high grades is because they gave high importance in effort and learning.

i.e. (refer to the table above) mastery goal oriented focus on process of learning while performance goal focus on getting relatively higher grades than others... thus they get good grades because they are motivated in outperforming others..

lol basta ganun! hahahaha... i hope you get the difference from my cyclic explanation

Toni Rose said...

and i hope i didnt sound too technical haha